Romantic Jealousy and Facebook Use Correlation | Review

Romantic green-eyed monster and Facebook Use Correlation ReviewTamar ChemelWrite the reference for this article in APA style.Muscanell, L. N., Guadagno, E. R., Rice, L., Murphy, S. (2013). Dont it farm my brown eyes green? An analysis of facebook use and amative jealousy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 237-242. DOI 10.1089/cyber.2012.0411Write an overview or brief summary of the article in your own words. Indicate your assessment of what the submit is about and the major(ip) findings of the studyThis study seeks to seek the correlation between romantic jealousy and Facebook use with university-aged participants to envision themselves conceive their companions Facebook page with various supposititious situations (Muscanell, Guadagno, Rice, Murphy, 2013). The main look into question of the study was to explore how gender, seclusion congealtings on Facebook, and the existence of joins photos on the partners profile join and effect the negative e motions of the participants (Muscanell et al., 2013). The researchers predicted that female participants would experience and report more negative emotions and romantic jealousy than the males (Muscanell et al., 2013). The researchers in addition expected that the participants would experience more negative emotions when the hypothetical situations involved a romantic partners couple photos and tagged photos containing a privacy setting, indicating the partners desire to hide or entomb their relationship status (Muscanell et al., 2013). In addition, they alike believed that participants would self-report more powerful negative emotions if the hypothetical romantic partner did not have whatever couple photos up on their Facebook profile for others to see (Muscanell et al., 2013). The study examined quad particular negative frantic repartees to these hypothetical situations jealousy, anger, churn up and hurt (Muscanell et al., 2013). The results of the study indicated that wom en more than men responded odour more jealous, angry, and hurt to the imagined situations of a partners photos made private rather than being visual to all of their friends or Facebook users (Muscanell et al., 2013). Participants, both male and female, responded to feeling disgust if an imagined romantic partners photos were set to private, and felt more disgust if there were no couple photos present on their partners Facebook profile (Muscanell et al., 2013).According to the introduction, what information was already known about the topic (look for references to previous research)?This current study was based off a previous study examining romantic jealousy and online Facebook use (Muise, Chirstofides, Desmarais, 2009). The results of this study indicates that individuals who utilize Facebook more often described greater jealousy in romantic relationships, and thus constantly unploughed track of their partners Facebook use and profile (Muise et al., 2009). Based on their theor etical framework, this current study used hypothetical scenarios to examine jealous and negative responses to romantic partners Facebook use. This study also had previous information about gender differences and social networking use, particularly with the use of Facebook. Thus, the researchers used the previous research to make the predictions about gender differences and the self-reported negative emotional responses associated with Facebook use (Guadagno Sagarin, 2010).What variables were studied? Identify the Independent and leechlike Variables if applicable. What were the hypotheses concerning these variables?The dependent variable in this study is the negative emotions self-reported by the participants in the study. These include romantic jealousy, hurt, disgust and anger. The independent variable is the hypothetical Facebook scenarios created by the researchers. The hypotheses be the sex differences of jealousy in regards to online information sacramental manduction behav ior.What were the operational definitions of the variables studied?Romantic relationships be defined as only heterosexual relationships. Facebook privacy settings are the modifications that control who can access any ad hominem information on the social networking website, including photographs, status updates and personal information. Negative emotions are outlined as hurt, disgust, anger and jealousy. Hypothetical Facebook situations are scenarios created by the researchers to explore the participants emotional responses to the online behaviour of an imagined romantic partner, such as Imagine that you see a picture of your serious romantic partner with another individual of the opposite sex.Who were the participants in the study? Were there any specific participant characteristics?The participants were both male and female undergraduate students, who were heterosexual, mainly of Caucasian ethnicity, and had Facebook accounts.What were the procedures used to test the hypotheses? Did you check off any problematic features of the procedure?Participants were randomly assigned to one of the nine conditions set up by the researchers (Muscanell et al., 2013). After imagining this hypothetical Facebook scenario, participants were encouraged to self-report on a scale, assessing jealousy and other associated negative emotions in response to the imagined situation (Muscanell et al., 2013). The main problem associated with a self-reporting study is the participants self-reporting behaviour, which is inherently subjective and non-scientific, as well as susceptible to the social desirability bias.Was the experimental or non-experimental method used? Were there attempts to control any extraneous variables?This research would be considered experimental research, as the independent variable was manipulated to examine how that will curve the dependent variable. In this study, the researchers manipulated the experimental conditions of the hypothetical Facebook scenarios t o examine how it would influence the participants negative emotions. The researchers outwardly stated that the hypothetical situations were ambiguous, which may lead to extraneous factors influencing an individuals emotional response. Perhaps if the setting and environment were not hypothetical or imagined, this research would yield more applicable and generalizable results.What were the major results of the study? Were the results consistent with the hypotheses?As predicted and consistent with previous research, the results of the study indicated that women responded with more powerful feelings of jealousy, hurt and anger to the hypothetical Facebook scenarios created by the researchers (Muscanell et al., 2013). In addition, all participants had increased feelings of jealousy, disgust, anger and hurt when they had to visualize their romantic partner not having any couple photographs present on their Facebook profile or having those photos set to private so no other Facebook users o r friends could see them (Muscanell et al., 2013).Did the author give suggestions for future research or applications? Can you provide other suggestions?The authors did strike limitations to the study, and directions for future research in the area. One suggestion indicates that future researchers should study the long-lasting effects of privacy settings and couple-related information availability on romantic relationships (Muscanell et al., 2013). Age and sexuality are two factors that this study did not include, and future research might be able to indicate how these results differ if they were to examine various ages or sexualities (Muscanell et al., 2013). As the study also suggested, future research should also examine the behavioral outcomes of these negative emotions that are elicited from the manipulation of privacy settings used on Facebook which can have potential real-life implications for interpersonal relationships (Muscanell et al., 2013). other direction researchers could take is to examine how the manipulation of privacy settings on other social networking sites influence the likeliness of extra-relational affairs and success of relationships and how that has changed since social networking sites like Facebook existed.