Criticizing Augustine's Account of Natural and Moral Evil Essay

Criticizing Augustines Account of Natural and honorable Evil - Essay ExampleA number of mortals willing be saved by the love and compassion of God, and others will be denounced to end little suffering. Ultimately, the justice and purity of God are expressed. After reading the City of God, particularly Books XI-XIV, I came to oppose Augustines history of the roots and of the ultimate nature of righteous vicious. It is argued that the concept of temporarily righteous entities intentionally giving in to sin is meaningless and paradoxical. A genuinely immaculate entity, albeit free to commit transgressions, would ideally or, in truth, neer commit even one sin. To point the root of detestation to the intentional wrongdoing of a faultless entity is hence to claim the ultimate irony that evil has shaped itself out of nothing. Moreover, there seems to be a dissonance between this theological account and the canon of predestination of Augustine, which effectively creates the root of moral evil within the liability and intention of God. The canon of Augustine talks about the descending of angels. Augustine introduced the notion of Natural and Moral evil. The former are the occurrences that resemble evil, like war, flood, earthquakes, etc. They resemble evil because gentle beings are control by selfishness, have an imperfect consciousness and understanding and are not capable of discerning the sniffy purpose of the unraveling play of God. Hence, when seen in the point of view of Gods grand purpose, natural evils turn back to appear evil in any way. In contrast, moral evil is the outcome of human accomplish and will. These are the blameworthy outcomes of a resolve that has become tied to mundane or inferior principles and activities, masking them as though they were greater. Basically, moral evil is the deviation of the will from God and relating itself to lower principles as though they were greater. My purpose in this paper is to argue against Augustines account of the Natural evil and Moral evil or, more particularly, the problem of evil. The Flaws of Augustines Natural Evil and Moral Evil I mostly protest to the notion that God granted good being the liberty to commit sin. If a creature is faultless in its righteousness it would in no way commit any transgression even though it is free to do so. Evil would therefore have to form itself out of nothing, which is absurd. Nevertheless, it is not logical that moral faultlessness essentially involves indisputability. Moreover, Augustines dispute of the Manicheans notion of the human soul as lowers divided component would eradicate the vital difference between the maker and the created (Jones 1969). In addition, it would counterbalance the responsibility of human beings for the perpetration of sin. The argument of Augustine, by eliminating the essence of Satan as a contributing(prenominal) factor, makes all the arguments of the Manicheans illogical (Jones 1969). Similar to all excell ent critiques Augustine prevails by eliminating the core principle that the argument of the Manicheans is grow in God, being supremely real, is supremely good. Gods creatures, being in varying degrees less real than God, are in corresponding degrees less good. Their so-called evil is simply the absence of trade good and reality it is the inevitable consequence of their status as creature (Jones 1969, 95). Moreover, Natural evil is the outcome of human weaknesses, more particularly, human beings